I’m no athlete and not a fast rider. I don’t think I can tell the difference between good and bad when it comes to tyres. Although I always loved Crossmark tyres. For whatever reason I felt fast when I rode with them.
Of course they’re designed for dry and hardpack conditions which are enjoyable to ride in! Then if it was wet, I didn’t expect them to provide much traction or grip so slowed down to allow for the non-chunky tread.
Then when I got my 29er it came with Ikon tyres. I would have preferred Crossmarks but started with them. I couldn’t tell any difference so stuck with them. Then I ripped a sidewall on one and needed to replace it so went with a Schwalbe Racing Ralph. They were on sale, I bought a pair, and was told that would be similar.
I’ve never loved them and occasionally felt like the bike was skittish, particularly in the front. Of course I never thought it would be the tyre, I just figured it was my inability as a rider. Eventually they became worn enough to replace and I found the Ikon in the garage so popped that on the front and planned to buy something for the rear the next day (most likely a Crossmark).
With the Ikon on the front and a worn Racing Ralph on the back I went out riding and wow! The Ikon is so much better. No more skittish handling or uncertain cornering. It was like my skill level has multipled overnight! So I went to the shop and bought another.
I remain convinced I’m an average rider on my best day. But the difference between the Racing Ralph and Ikon is nothing short of amazing. The Ikon is highly rated by people who know and even my lowly skills seem to agree.
So it is that I’ve decided I’ll ride Ikon tyres (which I’ll convert to tubeless shortly) for the tour. Everything I read also seems to suggest Ikons are the go to tyre for ultra endurance riding.










